Wednesday, February 17, 2010
SAVE JOHN BOYD THACHER STATE PARK
Here is a post for signing petition to Save John Boyd Thacher State Park.
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/savethacherpark/
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
APRIL MEMORY REVISITED
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa99e/aa99ef7eeb53e31c3899d19139ead5a4a5e31627" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2ab0/c2ab09c58232d8e43f88643ff07ab6c396db8573" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fe2e/3fe2e21c99175680cabf3e512129d1fc06484dba" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96f8a/96f8a3886a617501cbc62fc69a227a43c6fe40c4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/846d3/846d37bf7cff2ae4c0638d353f350640d54ba732" alt=""
Monday, February 15, 2010
NORMANS KILL CORRIDOR STUDY
Laura DeGaetano has passed on the link to the Normans Kill Corridor Study. (Please note I won't be separating the word Normanskill into two words except when it is officially presented as such. I guess either is correct but to me Normanskill is correct!) For anyone interested, the Normans Kill corridor study can now be viewed on the Office of Natural Resource Conservation's website.
http://www.albanycounty.com/departments/edcp/default.asp?id=399
for information contact:
Laura DeGaetano , Sr. Natural Resource Planner
Albany County Office of Natural Resource Conservation
112 State St. Room 720 Albany, NY 12207 (518) 447-5670
Notes from Executive Summary of Normans Kill Corridor Study including recommended actions
This study of a 1-km corridor on either side of the Normans Kill in Albany County
was conducted in order to highlight the value of the stream and surrounding
land as a buffer and habitat as well as to explore the opportunities for passive
recreation both in the stream and on adjacent land. The resulting document is
meant to serve as an overview of natural and recreational resources in the
corridor and a basis for moving forward toward protecting habitat and enhancing
recreational uses.
***
An analysis of the information collected for this study revealed that there are
many valuable environmental features along the Normans Kill corridor, a healthy
diversity of plants and animals, as well as several opportunities to improve
access to the stream and expand passive recreational uses in the corridor.
Land use mapping indicated that there are over 11,000 acres of forest, oldfield,
agricultural land, and other undeveloped land in the corridor, in addition to
concentrated areas of residential development and several large residential
subdivisions recently constructed and proposed along the stream. There is some
concern about the impact that development will have on stream bank stability
and water quality as the currently developed areas appear to be more impacted
by erosion and sedimentation problems.
Previous studies of the Normans Kill documented landslides and areas along
the stream that are slippage-prone due to soil type and slope. While an
analysis of current planning and zoning laws found that there are some
protections provided to riparian areas and steep slopes, there may be room
to enhance local plans and laws to further protect the Normans Kill and the
adjacent land that buffers it. In order to preserve important habitat and
species diversity; prevent erosion, landslides, and flooding; and protect
water quality, it appears that the best use of the riparian corridor is for
passive recreation such as kayaking/canoeing, hiking, fishing, and wildlife
observation.
Toward this end, recommendations for improved recreational access
and use include the following:
Explore the possibility of a footpath connection between Western Turnpike
Golf Course in Guilderland and the Pine Bush Preserve trail network
Connect trails at the Normans Kill Farm in the City of Albany to other
proximate trail systems
Look for ways to extend the City of Albany’s trail network beyond the
municipal golf course into Bethlehem possibly using easements along the
creek from new developments
Work with the Department of Environmental Conservation to establish
public fishing access points and easements.
Establish formal canoe/kayak launch sites and consider developing a water
trail Pursue possibilities for facilitating public use of the area currently limited
by conflicts associated with the National Guard Rifle Range in the Town of
Guilderland.
Encourage and facilitate formation of a Normans Kill Watershed Council
consisting of interested stakeholders including residents, government
agencies, businesses, and private not-for-profits to examine the potential
for trail connections, boating and fishing access, and habitat protection in
the corridor.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
A VOICE FOR THE NORMANSKILL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f9f4/2f9f4644eb69f4f7ee895dc2b225fb691e1e885f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20125/20125031077654d584b9bc7ba0f9d11a97eb3f72" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa681/aa6814c1a3416d5f3ec2dac2a8a992617336f5a5" alt=""
NORMANSKILL NOTES
The Normanskill watershed is a near perfect example of how political boundaries divide and obscure natural systems. While it doesn’t appear to me these divisions are insurmountable, they do leave watershed concerns without an obvious policy structure or forum with which to focus attention. In some parts of the world, there are river systems shared by different countries. There are also rivers that serve as boundaries or move water from one country or state to another. The Normanskill does neither. The Normanskill is found entirely in New York State. As a major tributary, the watershed receives recognition as important to advocates and friends of the Hudson River. Not crossing national or state boundaries is an advantage to political management and a few less layers of government hopefully simplifies land-use planning and the watershed protector’s landscape. There are still global and bio-regional concerns which should be on the Normanskill watch list but these concerns reflect local problems and solutions with the harm and benefits to be derived locally as well.
The political divisions of Counties, Towns, City and Villages are the divisions that largely remove the bio-regional view of this 170 square mile territory from the local population’s concerns and the local planning agency’s priorities. Which is not to say there are not concerned citizens, workers, and officials with a green environmental, open space, natural resource awareness, smart planning perspective; who recognize the importance of understanding and sustaining the whole living system they live in.
I see two major divides of this river system. One is the Watervliet Reservoir. The watershed above the dam has interested parties concerned with water quality and by extension development, drainage, and pollution control. A second major biological divide is the estuary at the river’s confluence with the Hudson River near the Port of Albany. The landscape there is industrialized and like much of the Albany shore filled, dredged, and drowned to the point that its natural and human history is difficult to discern. Castle Island is no more, now you have a fill enlarged peninsula with obscured historical boundaries.
From the Watervielt Reservoir downstream through Towns of Guilderland and Bethlehem the Normanskill and tributaries drain a mixed urban and suburbanized area. Maybe because my own property drains off onto this part of the watershed, I here find more permutations and interesting areas to still explore—from the recognized uniqueness of the Pine Bush Barrens; the availability of a surprising amount of green space due mostly to steep banked riversides, the Hunger Kill and the other small urban streams that move through the City of Albany and on to major malls and the campus of SUNY Albany. I see this portion of the river as our “European Watershed.” Common sense says over a hundred years of industrializations, denser human habitation, and major levels of pollution have made the health of this part of the river irretrievable. That is unless the cultural and societal change of the next hundred years decides differently.
What is my proposed agenda for the Normanskill Watershed? First I would say to celebrate what we already have. A resource guide should be developed, eco-tourism encouraged, a sense of place, nature, seasonal activities; all to be encouraged. The publication NORMANSKILL can continue to be an anthology that networks and explores the depth of our bio-regional identity.
Next would be preservation, eco-system enhancement, renewable “green”industries, increased food production, sustainable forestry, locally marketed locally produced products and crafts. No new ideas here but as a friend said
recently, “We don’t need ideas. We need action.” I think there is a lot going on in these areas already. We need a catalog for access to what is available, perhaps included in the larger resource guide. On the political and planning level getting away from the “Big Pipe” mentality and seriously implementing water quality conscious decisions that involve different (and proven) technologies. Unless you live on a mountain peak, everyone is downstream from someone else.
Alan Casline
foot bridge at French's Hollow
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)